Uriel in ChinaGreen GrassJanuary 4, 2001by Uriel Wittenberg (uw@urielw.com)
My return imminent, I am bracing for the boredom of Toronto. Already the grass here is looking greener. Sure, there have been one or two irritations, but things could easily have been worse. As a teacher in Japan writes:
In my experience, most programs for Asian countries are little more than deceptive invitations to naifs (and among young teachers, especially ESLers, there are many) for situations whose greatest return is a tough lesson. Japan is certainly an example of a tough country where, for example, 50 US university branch campuses folded after a year or two (I was at two of these), and contains more stuck and struggling (though optimistic and proud) teachers than anyplace else I've been, including the middle east. Here, however, little sparks of humor and joy continue to occur even in these waning days, igniting in me a premature nostalgia. For example, something very tragic happened during the exam for my pre-university students. One of the students was caught cheating, red-handed. Some of you may recall the name "Toffee," mentioned in a couple of my previous missives. It's a terrible thing. It's not even me that spotted her, but Jim Wu. He saw her throw a piece of paper towards someone else (it wasn't clear who). I may have quibbled about Wu once or twice, but in the end he's quite a pleasant fellow all the same. Mr. Meng called me that evening about some administrative matter. I wished him a happy new year. (We're good friends again, with Wu reporting that he praises my efficiency to others.) I asked if he'd heard the news. He hadn't. "One student was caught cheating on the exam. It was Toffee." I was interested of course to see some sign of belated awareness, perhaps even a prostrate confession, that he and his colleagues had been risibly misguided to take up arms against me -- on behalf of a cheater! -- in the never-ending Toffee Wars. "Unnnhh. Well, it's late," he said with a yawn. "I just wanted to touch base. Let's talk tomorrow [about the admin thing]." Had he heard me? I wasn't in fact able to connect with him the next day. Coincidence? Or was he in hiding, the agony of shame and embarrassment -- or maybe the thought of my smile -- too much to bear? You'll recall also David. Three days after my (previously described) meeting about him with the deans, he packed his bags and left the school. All I was told was that he'd been exempted from further classes and from the final exams so he could go to Hubei, his home province, to arrange his visa. He'd still be going to England. Coincidence? Or connected with the meeting? That's the terrible thing about reality. I'm thinking of the movie world alternative, where you can still get some resolution, some closure. Rottenness, for example, is often clearly expounded by the helpful villain himself. We real world types, by contrast, especially those of us in China, live within a fog of ambiguity. It's curious that Hamlet, a creature of a playwright who must have appreciated this distinction (witness Iago's explication of his own wickedness), omits this additional woe:
[W]ho would bear ... Seems to me it's this country that's all too undiscover'd. And if he's implying that less "conscience" would help, I'd say give us more so we can at least get a better look at this lousy situation. Writing exam questions, by the way, is a rare opportunity to coerce people to think about something you've tried to tell them. So some questions pertained to the letter I'd written to the students. They got most answers right:
"It's easy for young people to choose the wrong path. Many young people in the world, however, are lucky enough to be pushed onto the right path by their parents or their schools."
|